“JC and the Cool Gang”

Every couple of years newspapers will run a feature article on hip young Christians and the rise of megachurches. Alas, today’s story, "JC and the Cool Gang", in the Weekend Australian Magazine, doesn’t break much new ground. It stays at the level of amazement or amusement that there are Christians who have combined mainstream youth culture with pentecostalism/ evangelicalism. The focus of the story is a young couple, Erica and Jim Bartle, he an extreme sports evangelist (‘extreme sports are an excellent way of capturing kids’ attention’) and she a former fashion journalist for a ‘glossy young women magazine’.

Some critiques of a ‘cool’ gospel are briefly offered, but I would have liked to have seen more. The public might be interested by an exploration of some of the challenges facing the evangelical church today – the tension between faithfulness and contextualisation; the polarisation between three broad factions: conservatives who reject postmodernism and doctrinal shifts to the ‘left’; the postconservatives who are theologically left; and the ‘mainstream’ who are theologically pragmatic and culturally corporate.

One could read the story and come away thinking that evangelicalism was a new phenomenon of the last twenty years, and that before that there were only old-fashioned Anglican and Catholic churches. The transformation of Baptists and Assemblies of God (to name just two) from old-fashioned evangelical to a mix of the factions I mentioned is a more nuanced and interested story. And Anglicans and Catholics have never been uniform. A discussion of the strength of Sydney Anglicanism would have complicated her story in a good way.

But I’m hoping for too much – journalists have to try to get on top of a new topic each story and they’re never going to please people on the ‘inside’ of those stories.


4 thoughts on ““JC and the Cool Gang”

  1. Nathan – you are right. Informed journalism in Australia on churches and faith is virtually nonexistent. There have been rare examples where the SMH and the Age for periods have employed a specialist journalist who over a period of years built up knowledge and understanding. They have been the exception rather than the rule.

    1. Lucky you Doug – we only have the West or the Australian over here. 🙂 Although I’m not sure what the Canberra Times is like over your way.

  2. Hi Nathan,
    Your three streams of Evangelicalism may be true, but I do not see much post conservative evangelicalism out my way within a 15 minute drive from my place. There are 3 Baptist churches, 3 Assemblies of God, 1 Westminster Presbyterian, 1 Apostolic, and 2 Churches of Christ that I know of.

    Among those are 2 ‘mainstream’ whereas the rest are Fundamentalist/Conservative. It may be true that Baptist and Assemblies of God are opening up, but I do not see much of it out my way. I must be a little unlucky?

    John Arthur

  3. There are definite signs of a thaw in the Evangelical icecap here in the UK. Judging by the sniping going on from the Reformed camp the conservative right is seriously rattled by the emergents and an outbreak of honesty around the Evangelical shibboleths: atonement, universalism, etc. At the back of all this ferment are two huge issues: who is God and how is God known. I wonder though, if Evangelicalism was really ever as monolothic as it seemed. My first introduction to mysticism, for example, came via A.W.Tozer. Whatever fortress we make for ourselves there’s always a back door somewhere. Unfortunately there’s also a dungeon!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s